Fairleigh Dickinson
Fairleigh Dickinson Knights (7-7)
NEC (4-1)
Live RPI
Down 1 since
SUN, MAR 8th

2026 Fairleigh Dickinson Knights Impact Games

Impact Games are games that can move a team up or down the RPI Ladder (increase or decrease RPI Rank).
Direct Impact Games are head-to-head matchups for the team.
Indirect Impact Games are games that include a previous opponent of the team and impact the team's SOS component of RPI.
Late in the season, Indirect Impact Games may only have a small impact on a team's RPI Rank.
Normally, a win will increase a team's RPI Rank and a loss will decrease it, but sometimes when playing a really strong opponent a win or a loss will increase RPI Rank and when playing a much weaker opponent a win or a loss will decrease RPI Rank.
RPI Points are approximate.

RPI Ladder

RPI Team RPI Pts
Needed
1 2855
25 1676
50 1460
75 1251
100 1086
125
902
150 688
175 536
200 420
225
275
237 225
238 221
239 219
240 214
241 213
242 203
243 189
244 188
245 186
246 160
247 132
248 118
249 106
250 102
251 32
252 18
253 16
254 12
255 11
256 -
257 -5
258 -22
259 -31
260 -87
261 -90
262 -99
263 -100
264 -110
265 -138
266 -149
267 -153
268
-177
269 -179
270 -184
271 -189
272 -220
273 -275
274 -276
275 -278
300 -670
301 -692

Direct Impact Games

Final/7
R H E
Coppin State
(2-12, 2-3 NEC)
5 7 3
Fairleigh Dickinson
(7-7, 4-1 NEC)
15 13 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E
COPP 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 5 7 3
FDIC 0 0 0 2 3 6 4 15 13 3
Live Win Probability
COPP
50%
50%
FDIC
Fairleigh Dickinson Wins:
Fairleigh Dickinson Loses:
-14 RPI Points
-202 RPI Points

Indirect (SOS) Impact Games

Final/7
R H E
Wagner
(2-12, 1-3 NEC)
4 8 1
Long Island
(4-8, 4-0 NEC)
15 12 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E
WAG 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 4 8 1
LIU 2 7 6 0 0 0 0 15 12 3
Live Win Probability
WAG
50%
50%
LIU
Wagner Wins:
Wagner Loses:
61.2 RPI Points
-10.2 RPI Points
Final
R H E
William & Mary
(6-11, 0-3 Coastal Athletic)
8 9 1
Georgetown
(13-7, 0-0 Big East)
2 6 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E
W&M 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 2 8 9 1
GTWN 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 6 2
Live Win Probability
W&M
50%
50%
GTWN
Georgetown Wins:
Georgetown Loses:
17.9 RPI Points
-33.2 RPI Points
Final
R H E
Longwood
(14-5, 1-1 Big South)
2 9 0
Gardner-Webb
(11-8, 1-1 Big South)
7 12 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E
LONG 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 0
WEBB 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 X 7 12 0
Live Win Probability
LONG
50%
50%
WEBB
Gardner-Webb Wins:
Gardner-Webb Loses:
15.0 RPI Points
-20.7 RPI Points
Final
R H E
Merrimack
(7-7, 4-1 MAAC)
7 12 2
Iona
(3-9, 2-3 MAAC)
4 8 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E
MRMK 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 7 12 2
IONA 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 4 8 1
Live Win Probability
MRMK
50%
50%
IONA
Iona Wins:
Iona Loses:
20.6 RPI Points
-6.9 RPI Points
Final
R H E
Hofstra
(3-9, 2-3 Coastal Athletic)
5 6 2
Monmouth
(7-8, 4-1 Coastal Athletic)
4 8 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E
HOF 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 6 2
MONM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 8 3
Live Win Probability
HOF
50%
50%
MONM
Monmouth Wins:
Monmouth Loses:
11.9 RPI Points
-10.4 RPI Points
Final
R H E
Manhattan
(6-10, 1-4 MAAC)
3 8 1
Fairfield
(5-9, 3-2 MAAC)
4 3 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E
MANH 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 8 1
FAIR 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 X 4 3 1
Live Win Probability
MANH
50%
50%
FAIR
Manhattan Wins:
Manhattan Loses:
13.1 RPI Points
-7.9 RPI Points